Medupi fails Eskom and SA – the stuff of nightmares

Following major problems that brought Eskom’s Medupi power station to its knees during the height of last week’s load shedding, Medupi manager Rudi van der Wal is leaving Eskom to take up a position overseas.

Van der Wal had resigned before the mess started and was due to leave in about two weeks. But following the events last week he was made to step aside before his pending departure.

Other staff at Medupi have been dismissed by Eskom head of generation Bheki Nxumalo for negligence, in what Eskom chief operating officer Jan Oberholzer calls “consequence management”, following a number of major problems at the power station that contributed to last week’s load shedding.

Additional problems at Medupi have now been identified that were not previously disclosed to the public by Eskom management.

For some time, the stackers that load coal from Exxaro’s Grootegeluk mine onto the stockpiles at the Medupi stockyard, and the reclaimers that take coal from the stockpiles to feed coal by conveyor to the power station boilers, have not been working.

So, to get fuel to the Medupi boilers, the coal stockyard was bypassed and the single main coal conveyor feed from Grootegeluk mine was feeding the power station directly, without any redundancy in the system.

Thus, when the 4.5km single main coal conveyor feed from the Grootegeluk mine failed on Eskom’s side with a broken belt, Medupi was left with no coal feeding its boilers other than about one or two shifts’ worth of fuel in the bunkers at each boiler.

Not working

To add to the disaster, it is now clear that blocked chute and belt rip detectors on the conveyor were not working. Thus, the conveyor did not trip when it should have done in order to protect the system. This caused damage to some 700m of belt, as well as damage to the conveyor structures.

With the main coal conveyor from Grootegeluk mine down, and the stacker/reclaimers at the Medupi stockyard not working, coal now had to be transported by truck from the stockyard, for offloading at the emergency Buffalo conveyors at the boiler bunkers, in order to get fuel to the boilers.

This posed a major logistical nightmare due to the huge volumes of coal involved. Major congestion of coal trucks transporting coal from the stockyard to the bunkers forced the power output of Medupi to be reduced to a third of normal, thus contributing to load shedding.

Then problems were experienced with the ash-handling plant, which conveys ash from burning coal in the boilers to the ash dumps. Staff working on the bunker feed problems were shifted to deal with the huge build-up of ash, thus compounding the problems.

The good news is that the main coal conveyor from Grootegeluk mine is expected to be operating again shortly, thus relieving the logistical problem of transporting coal by truck and manually offloading the coal at the emergency Buffalo conveyors to feed to the boiler bunkers.

The bad news is that the stacker/reclaimers are still not working. So, with the coal stockyard bypassed, Medupi remains vulnerable and dependent on a single, long conveyor feed from Grootegeluk mine, without any redundancy if the conveyor should fail or trip for whatever reason.

In summary, the known problems at Eskom’s Medupi power station include:

1. The main conveyor from Grootegeluk mine feeding coal to Medupi failed, causing belt and structural damage;
2. Protection devices on the conveyor failed to detect the fault timeously;
3. The stacker/reclaimers at the Medupi coal stockyard are not working, and the coal stockyard is thus bypassed;
4. Coal was being transported by truck from the stockyard to the boiler bunkers, causing massive congestion and forcing reduced power output of the generators;
5. The coal mills are of wrong design, causing excessive wear and tear, with increased maintenance and downtime;
6. The design height of the boilers is inadequate (too low), thus causing excessive temperatures within the boiler and flue gas;
7. Excessive flue gas temperature is causing premature failure of the pulse-jet fabric filters, which are essential for fly-ash collection and pollution control; and
8. The ash-handling system is unable to cope with the volume of bottom ash and fly ash from the boilers.

• Chris Yelland is the investigative editor at EE Publishers
• This article was originally published on Moneyweb and is used here with permission